Huffington Publish correspondent Jen Bendery asked comically leading questions of White Home Press Secretary Jen Psaki with regards to Ted Cruz’s objection to President Joe Biden’s pledge to appoint a Black girl to the Supreme Court.

Over the weekend right through his podcast, Cruz instructed his cohost “The truth that he’s keen to make a promise on the outset, that it need to be a Black girl, I’ve received to assert, that’s offensive,” and added “You realize, Black women are what, 6 percent of the U.S. inhabitants? He’s saying that 94 p.c of Americans, I don’t supply a rattling about you. You’re ineligible. He’s saying, if you are a white guy, difficult success. If you are white women, tough success. You don’t qualify.”

Psaki delivered a blistering rebuttal to that objection at Tuesday’s briefing, and at Wednesday’s press briefing, Bendery revisited the subject — and even read again part of Psaki’s response from the day before today:

Some Republican senators, like Ted Cruz, are criticizing Biden for saying he’ll pick a Black lady for the Supreme Court docket. He mentioned it’s, quote, unquote, “offensive,” because somehow the Black woman he chooses wouldn’t be probably the most certified for the job.

However Republicans like Cruz additionally celebrated when Trump picked Amy Coney Barrett for the Supreme Courtroom, with Cruz telling Barrett all through her affirmation hearing, quote, “Your kids have been wonderfully neatly behaved. I think you’re a fantastic function edition for little ladies. What recommendation would you give little ladies?”

Here’s the alternate that Psaki and Bendery described:

Bendery adopted that windup with a query whose thrust used to be quite obtrusive, deliberately so:

So, my question for you is: Why do you suppose Republicans like Ted Cruz are acting so angry about Biden selecting a Black girl for the Supreme Court docket, when they were more than pleased when Trump picked Amy Coney Barrett for the Courtroom?

A naturally amused Psaki spoke back with the aid of additionally highlighting the discrepancy, and putting the onus on Cruz to give an explanation for the variation:

I learn that individual quote the previous day. I’m glad a number of individuals are following it. You realize, I think that’s really a question for Senator Cruz. But it is important to word, as you simply did to your query, that there has by no means — there was by no means an objection with the aid of Senator Cruz to Donald Trump promising he’d nominate a girl in 2020. You noted what he stated to the woman he nominated within the listening to and how he applauded her within the hearing.

The notion — the President’s view is the notion that there has now not been a Black woman ever on the Supreme Court docket in 230 years is an issue with the method, not a lack of qualified, credentialed folks to consider and nominate.

And, you recognize, that’s his view, but I think that’s a question very best for Senator Cruz.

Bendery took every other more on-the-nostril shot at it, asking “Why do you assume — what’s the adaptation between Trump choosing Amy Coney Barrett and pronouncing he’d choose a girl upfront, and Biden choosing a Black woman and saying…”

“That’s precisely why I referred to as out this problem the day gone by,” Psaki stated, and cracked “But I’m blissfully not a spokesperson for Senator Cruz, so he can best answer that question.”

The clear implication — barely unstated — is that Cruz did not object to Trump’s promise because he knew the nominee would grow to be White. But it usually is a whole lot of other issues.

Watch above via CNN.

The publish WATCH: Reporter Comically Invites Psaki to Name Ted Cruz’s SCOTUS Objection Racist first regarded on Mediaite.