Freshly-hired CNN felony analyst and former Chief Assistant District Lawyer within the Big apple District Legal professional’s Place of business Karen Friedman Agnifilo pushed back on the flood of critics who say Long island District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s case against ex-President Donald Trump is vulnerable.

Trump traveled to New York Tuesday for his arraignment in a Big apple court, all over which Bragg’s indictment was once unsealed and the 34 prison counts against Trump were revealed. The defendant entered pleas of “no longer guilty” to crimes involving hush cash payments to adult leisure entrepreneur Stormy Daniels and others, and left the courthouse with out answering questions.

DA Bagg held a press convention following the court look, all the way through which he defended his case from an onslaught of questions from newshounds. In addition to Trump allies, there have been many pundits weighing in to criticize the strength of Bragg’s case — including on CNN.

But on Wednesday morning’s adaptation of CNN This Morning, Agnifilo and CNN commentator Errol Louis joined co-anchors Don Lemon, Poppy Harlow, and Kaitlan Collins to speak about her new column with Norm Eisen, whose title says all of it: “We Ultimately Know the Case Against Trump, and It Is Strong.”

Agnofilo explained why she’s going against the grain of a lot of the punditry in regards to the case:

POPPY HARLOW: Let me just begin with you. Your piece in The Occasions this morning with Norm Eisen is actually interesting. The headline is “We eventually comprehend the case towards Trump and it’s strong.” That’s a different position than even some of Trump’s most vehement opponents. You say this is vulnerable. I feel we can agree it’s incomplete, proper, Because we don’t know what that underlying crime is that Barack is pointing to. But why do you think it’s so strong?

KAREN FRIEDMAN AGNIFILO: I think it’s strong as a result of in addition to the indictment that used to be filed, they also filed a remark of tips which…

POPPY HARLOW: 13 pages.

KAREN FRIEDMAN AGNIFILO: Yeah, thirteen pages of a commentary of details in point of fact important points the proof and the fees and the speculation of the case against him. And it’s clear that they’ve plenty of corroboration right here. You’ve bought now not just the word of Michael Cohen, you’ve got Michael Cohen, you’ve obtained David Pecker, who was once the CEO of AMI that owns the Nationwide Enquirer. They usually had a conspiracy, the three of them, to trap and kill poor tales all over the time of the presidential election. And it’s and they have got proof. They have emails, textual content messages, recordings. And so, and the timing really shows that that’s the case. And so I believe when you put all of it together from an evidentiary function, I believe it’s an extraordinarily strong case that, in fact, there are felony arguments that can be made and challenges by means of the security. And we haven’t considered the witnesses testify underneath oath and be pass-examined yet. However that’s typical of each case. Just from a, from what we know now standpoint, it’s indisputably as sturdy as some other case that will get brought in state courts in New York.

KAITLAN COLLINS: And I feel it’s necessary what you word, that the conviction for the Trump Organization, for Allen Weisselberg, who was the executive monetary officer for the Trump Group, that’s who Trump retains referencing, have been trade falsification, had been a part of those prices and those convictions.

Agnofilo and Louis went on to knock down other criticisms which have been levelled in opposition to Braggs case, including the earlier prosecutors who didn’t pursue these charges.

Watch above by way of CNN This Morning.

The put up WATCH: CNN Prison Analyst Defies Bragg Critics To Lay Out Why Case In opposition to Trump Is Sturdy first appeared on Mediaite.