MSNBC host Jen Psaki mocked a Republican congressman who used to be stumped right through a listening to when requested “What excessive crime and misdemeanor are you investigating” with the impeachment probe into President Joe Biden.

Republicans formalized their impeachment inquiry this week in a 221 to 212 vote — despite widespread acknowledgment by way of journalists (together with Dan Abrams) and even other Republicans that there is “no proof” of wrongdoing by means of President Biden.

On Sunday’s adaptation of MSNBC’s Inside With Jen Psaki, Psaki asked Rep. Joe Neguse (D-CO) about his grilling of Rep. Guy Reschenthaler (R-PA) concerning the tricky question of the hour — what crime specifically are you investigating?:

JEN PSAKI, MSNBC HOST: Every single House Republican voted this week to move forward with the impeachment inquiry into President Biden.

So, Congressman Joe Neguse had a very simple query — gave the impression of one to me — for one among them. Let’s just say he didn’t get a quite simple resolution back.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

REP. JOE NEGUSE (D-CO): What’s the specific constitutional crime that you’re investigating?

REP. GUY RESCHENTHALER (R-PA): Well, we’re having an inquiry for you to do an investigation —

NEGUSE: OK.

RESCHENTHALER: — and compel the manufacturing of witnesses —

NEGUSE: And what’s the crime you’re investigating?

RESCHENTHALER: — and paperwork.

High crimes, misdemeanors, bribery.

NEGUSE: What high crime and misdemeanor are you investigating?

RESCHENTHALER: Seem, I will — when I get time, I will explain what we’re looking at.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

PSAKI: And Congressman Neguse joins me now.

Well, can I just say, looking at that, which I watched a few times, it’s very cringey to observe that.

However I do want to ask you about that new poll I just talked about as a result of even if this is completely baseless, the ballot shows that 70 percent of Republicans are in prefer of impeachment complaints.

As I wish to ask you, does that issue you? And what do you — what reality do you assume isn’t translating right here to individuals, or what details no longer translating to individuals available in the market?

NEGUSE: Well, it’s excellent to be with you, Jen.

Certainly, that considerations me but I would say it’s more a reflection of the extremism that has metastasized inside the Republican Party. And most of the empirical data that I’ve seen means that impartial voters don’t, on the end of the day, or rather usually are not, tuning into this farce of a course of that —

PSAKI: Uh-huh.

NEGUSE: — Republicans have initiated against President Biden.

My experience is that most Americans care about kitchen desk concerns — financial increase, rising costs, constructing safer communities, all of which House Democrats were singularly focused on with, after all, the management of President Biden.

So, no, I feel as this course of unfolds, you are going to in finding that increasingly Americans will register their objections to it as a result of they recognize what you stated at the outset, which is that Republicans have conceded, they are doing this for political purposes. I mean, they’re now not — they’re unabashed about the truth that they are doing this as a political exercise to actual retribution in opposition to President Trump and — or excuse me, President Biden, on behalf of President Trump, and for no different cause. I feel the American individuals get it.

PSAKI: Yeah, to your point, I imply, there’s such an overreach risk right here. I mean, we’ve considered — in the event you return to the ‘90s when President Clinton was impeached, in fact, that used to be additionally a different situation. However there was — I mean, there had a political influence.

Do you assume there’s attainable for Democrats to roughly rally across the president and rally together by contrast overreach — politically?

NEGUSE: I indisputably suppose — yeah, seem to be, I don’t think that this course of is going to inure to the advantage of Republicans. But extra necessary than that, Jen, is the truth that this is doing deep damage for my part to our republic. It’s a distortion of the impeachment clause in our Structure.

You performed that change from the Rules Committee, which was once, in fact, revealing and instructive. The fact that they may be able to’t articulate a cogent foundation for impeachment, the truth that they can’t level to any connection to the constitutional standard for impeachment, which, of course, as you already know, is an exacting standard.

The final impeachment that we had, in fact, was the impeachment of former President Trump for inciting a violent mob to disrupt the Electoral School complaints on January 6th. That was once a bipartisan impeachment. And so, the false equivalency that Republicans have tried to create falls flat.

And again, I feel the American people acknowledge that. It’s why whilst you look at empirical knowledge, pulling information, it suggests that almost all Americans do not imagine this to be a priority, and if anything, agree that it’ll be a waste of time. They’d like to peer that Congress get back to doing the basic work of governing.

PSAKI: Yeah, the harmful precedent piece is such an important level.

Watch above by the use of MSNBC’s Within With Jen Psaki.

The put up ‘Very Cringey To Watch!’ Jen Psaki Mocks Republican Who Got Stumped At Impeachment Probe Listening to first appeared on Mediaite.