Supply: www.huffingtonpost.com – Saturday, February 15, 2014
Ultimate Sunday, the lead article on the new pink duvet of the The New York Times journal was once “Sexless but Equal.” It used to be smartly-timed for Valentine’s Day, and guaranteed to cause all people who aren’t already feeling adequate to feel even more so. The gist of the article is this: Sure, lately’s woman would possibly have more lend a hand round the home from her husband, however that spells doom and gloom in the bed room. In line with the article’s author, therapist Lori Gottlieb, men who pitch in round the home are having intercourse 1.5 fewer instances per month than folks who don’t. This it appears has something to do with us powerful working better halves seeing them as doormats as a substitute of with the ability to fantasize that we’re married to that guy in Fifty Shades of Gray who would take regulate and tie us up. Naturally I learn this article and saw pink, now not red, for Valentine’s Day. What sort of bologna is the media serving up now? I kept thinking about the article all week. At one level, I remembered a cocktail party I’d attended a number of years in the past, one the place the conversation turned to intercourse. All of the guests seated on the table were women. (The lone two guys at the birthday party had been outside observing the youngsters.) And at that birthday celebration I was once startled to listen to how a number of the women evaded having intercourse at all. “When he goes upstairs, I simply tell him I’m going downstairs to turn out the lights or whatever, and if I keep down there lengthy sufficient, he’s all the time asleep by the time I come up,” said one woma

Go to News Source