New York Times Pushes Back Against Politico Report

Brian Zak/Sipa Press by the use of AP Images

Politico’s prolonged file on a “chilly struggle” between President Joe Biden and the New York Times has earned some main pushback from the latter.

Among the splashy revelations in Thursday’s Politico file is the suggestion that Occasions publisher AG Sulzberger has “quietly” inspired negative tales about Biden, together with on his age and poll numbers, as retaliation over the president no longer agreeing to an interview. The claim was noted to an unnamed Instances reporter.

The Times responded to the allegation with a prolonged commentary on Thursday, first stated on by way of Semafor’s Max Tani.

In a remark to @semafor, a New York Instances spokesperson pushes again on this, announcing "the notion that any line of protection has been ordered up or encouraged in retaliation for declining an interview, or every other reason, is outrageous and unfaithful." https://t.co/ALy9CKkk1u %twitter.com/oPzRxLkXfV

— Max Tani (@maxwelltani) April 25, 2024

“For any individual who is aware the function of free press in a democracy, it must be troubling that the President has so actively and effectively avoided questions from unbiased journalists over the direction of his time period,” the observation from a spokesperson for the paper reads.

Consistent with Politico’s reporting, Sulzberger has been so serious about touchdown an interview with Biden that he even took trip of an off-the-document assembly with Vice President Kamala Harris to inquire as to why the paper used to be now not getting a sure answer for the sit-down. The Occasions remark pushes back on this description, instead pronouncing Sulzberger has stressed in conversations with Harris and others that Biden could be surroundings a “dangerous precedent” through breaking tradition and no longer doing an interview with the Instances. The Times’s observation warns Biden now not sitting for an interview can be avoiding “scrutiny” and “accountability.”

The commentary denies any poor protection being pushed as retaliation against the president.

“The belief that any line of coverage has been ordered up or or encouraged in retaliation for declining an interview, or any other reason, is outrageous and unfaithful,” it reads.

New York Instances reporters Jonathan Swan and Peter Baker have also pushed again in opposition to Politico’s reporting on Sulzberger in separate X, formerly Twitter, posts.

Agreed. I’ve by no means heard AG say anything else like that nor any person else on the @nytimes. It's simply now not the best way it really works. AG desires us to cover this president — and each president — as fully, moderately and aggressively as we will because that's our function. That's real in spite of whether… https://t.co/4eY1T5kWrb

— Peter Baker (@peterbakernyt) April 25, 2024

“AG desires us to duvet this president — and every president — as totally, slightly and aggressively as we can as a result of that’s our role. That’s actual regardless of whether or not we get an interview. AG takes our duty very seriously and is a complete straight shooter,” Baker wrote.

The submit New York Occasions — And A few of Its Prime Newshounds — Fires Again At Politico Report Alleging Feud With Biden first regarded on Mediaite.