MSNBC host and former Biden White House press secretary Jen Psaki mocked President Donald Trump by maintaining a faux-Karoline Leavitt briefing to give her personal solutions to actual questions that had been asked of the White House press secretary.

On Friday’s model of MSNBC’s The Briefing with Jen Psaki, the host referenced her personal days on the podium and with a briefing room backdrop, used the mock-briefing layout to trash Trump over his crypto scheme, his firing of a Black girl from the submit of Librarian of Congress (heavily suggesting race and gender were the reasons), and different subject matters:

JEN PSAKI: I’ve observed the White House briefing room has taken a bit of a bizarro flip today. And I figured, what the hell, it’s a Friday night. Why no longer dust off the cobwebs and field a number of questions from the White Home press briefing room lately? As a result of it’s been some time.

In fact, I’m going to answer them without the same old MAGA spin. So we bought a few, they’re actual questions from today. And we’re going to begin with Andrew Eggers from the Bulwark. All right, Andrew, let’s hear what you bought.

REPORTER: The president posted some other ad this week for his Trump meme coin. The group that’s operating that coin is encouraging individuals to purchase in order to win a dinner this month with the president.

Why is the president planning to attend a dinner for the highest investors in his coin?

JEN PSAKI: I really like that he used to be reading it.

Well, Andrew, here’s the article. This is all in regards to the grift. Promoting get right of entry to to make himself and his adult sons richer is a key part of this presidency.

And bet what? It’s working. I imply, given that that dinner you talked about was once announced, the surge of trading has brought in more than $1 million in fees for Trump, his domestic and all their companions.

They’ve all netted greater than 320 million greenbacks because Trump’s coin debuted in January. So that’s why he’s planning to attend the dinner, the money for himself.

It’s pretty, that’s a horny simple one. oKay, we’re gonna take any other one. Jacqui Heinrich from Fox News.

REPORTER: Why did the White House announce this care for the UK ahead of the entire small print were finished?

Oh, Jacqui. Smartly, the announcement and the headlines it generates are pretty much the point. The main points are roughly secondary.

I imply, Trump will get to place on a convey in the Oval Workplace and fake like he’s achieved a enormous victory. The deal is only a little bit of an empty shell.

I imply you should, I assume, name it a framework, which is form of generous, or settlement to negotiate more than the rest. However the 10% tariff on goods continues to be in place. And there are big closing questions, enormous ones, like several UK tax on digital services and products for the U. S., one thing that may have huge results on American tech corporations. And there have been many more.

oK, subsequent question. Stephen Nelson from the New York Publish.

REPORTER: On New York, the mayor, Eric Adams, is right here nowadays. Can you tell us anything else more in regards to the seek advice from, who initiated it, what they’re talking about?

JEN PSAKI: I’d simply notice this reporter as soon as requested me if the Bidens had been going to place their canine down.

However that apart, here’s the answer to that question. Eric Adams is journeying as a result of he owes his present freedom to the man sitting in the White House. Let’s stop pretending that is on the level, like where the relationship is between a president and a New York Metropolis mayor just coordinating metropolis trade in a normal course of occasions. I imply, even the judge who allowed the case to be dropped stated that it, quote, smacks of a bargain.

oKay, we’ve obtained time, we’re having fun here. How about Nicole Killian from CBS News?

REPORTER: Can you just make clear the president’s place slightly bit namely on the tax issue? As a result of in his Truth Social publish he stated this morning that he would accept even a tiny tax elevate for the rich, however then says Republicans almost definitely shouldn’t do it, but I’m k if they do it.

So what’s it that he needs? Does he need them to increase the tax charges?

JEN PSAKI: I mean, Nicole, I completely remember why you’re confused right here, but let me let you know the truth that they are able to’t say from the rostrum right now. He simply indisputably does now not need them to increase taxes. And he’ll be even less inclined once he hears from any collection of his multimillionaire and even billionaire friends who will hate this. What he wants to be able to do is to claim to some a part of his political base, possibly working category voters, that he tried to get taxes raised on the absolute best profits, at least a small section of them. After which blame it on any person else for that failing. Whereas no longer taking the blame for the taxes going up. I mean, he is also conniving, however the man knows how you can learn a poll. He additionally doesn’t like indignant telephone calls from donors. So I assume, I imply he’s seeking to walk a tightrope right here, Nicole. K, subsequent query from Axios’s Sophia Kai.

REPORTER: The day past, the administration appears to have began dismantling the Shopper Product Safety Fee. This is the federal company, an unbiased one, that does remembers and is chargeable for product safety. Does the administration now not consider that it’s important, you already know, to maintain toys and cribs? I imply, you’re a young mom off of the process.

JEN PSAKI: I love that you simply needed to state to your query, Sophia, what they in fact do, which is essential for folk to take into account that. But that’s right. He did. And these people additionally check up on issues like strollers and seat belts. When you combine this with the impression that tariffs on China are going to have on the price of things like stroller and car seats and toys and cribs, it’s more or less exhausting to argue. They see the protection and affordability of these items as important. All proper. I received time for yet one more. Chris McGurion from the Related Press. Remaining one.

REPORTER: The President fired the Librarian of Congress. Why did he select to do that?

JEN PSAKI: All proper, Chris, why did Trump abruptly fireplace Carla Hayden, the Librarian of Congress, who has served in her place, I’d observe, when you consider that 2016 and was once demonstrated via the Senate with bipartisan strengthen in a vote of seventy four to 18?

Neatly, I’m going to make use of a visual help. right Here’s a picture of her. I’ll assist you to draw your individual conclusions on why Trump and his administration decided to fireside Carla Hayden.

Hope that was all clarifying.

Watch above by the use of MSNBC’s The Briefing with Jen Psaki.

The put up MSNBC’s Jen Psaki Solutions Questions On Trump In Mock Karoline Leavitt Briefing first seemed on Mediaite.