Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson squarely agreed with Justice Amy Coney Barrett when Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin requested her to weigh in on changing the scale of the Supreme Court.

All over Tuesday’s 2nd day of affirmation hearings, Durbin obtained Choose Jackson to claim one thing that courtroom-watchers most likely don’t predict to hear very regularly will have to she be seated to the Supreme Court docket: “I consider Justice Barrett.”

At problem: Durbin’s question about changing the size of the courtroom, which he first quoted then-Decide Barrett at size as declining to answer at her personal affirmation hearings. Judge Jackson in a similar fashion declined, many times telling Durbin she concurs with Barrett’s resolution:

SENATOR DURBIN: The difficulty, which is come up to my shock and I’ve spoken to my Republican colleagues about their fascination with it, is the notion that the composition of the Supreme Court docket, which you first euphemistically is known as courtroom-packing. I stated on the floor, and I’ll repeat here. There is exactly one dwelling senator who has successfully modified the dimensions of the Supreme Court. That was once the Republican chief, Senator McConnell, who shrank the court docket to eight seats for nearly a yr in 2016, when he blocked President Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland. Now, that query on courtroom-packing used to be posed to Amy Coney Barrett, justice in the courtroom, when she seemed earlier than this committee, she used to be requested about it. She said, and I quote, “may now not opine on it.” And on many different policy concerns, then-Decide Barrett stated repeatedly she may not share her views, stating, and I quote, “I will not express a view on a topic of public coverage, especially one that is politically controversial, because that is inconsistent with the judicial function.” I do consider we will have to have principles and traditions and precedents, however we shouldn’t have a separate algorithm for Republican nominees and Democratic nominees. So Choose Jackson, if a senator were to ask you today about proposals about altering the present measurement of the Supreme Court docket, what would your response be?

JUDGE JACKSON: Senator, I trust Justice Barrett in her response to that question when she used to be requested earlier than this committee, again, my North SuperStar is. The distinction of the correct function of a decide in our constitutional scheme, and in my view, judges will have to now not be speaking in, to political considerations and certainly not a nominee for a place on the Supreme Court. So I accept as true with Justice Barrett.

Watch above by way of CNN.

The submit ‘I Agree With’ Amy Coney Barrett: Choose Ketanji Brown Jackson Rebuffs Durbin Query on ‘Court docket Packing’ first regarded on Mediaite.