Axios reporter and CNN media analyst Sara Fischer joined CNN This Morning on Wednesday to speak about the newest bombshell revelations within the Fox Information defamation lawsuit.

Dominion Vote casting Programs is suing Fox for $1.6 billion, alleging that the best-of-center community knowingly unfold false claims relating to voter fraud about the company in the wake of the 2020 presidential election.

On Tuesday, the judge overseeing the swimsuit admonished Fox Information’s legal professionals for a final-minute disclosure that Rupert Murdoch can be an officer at Fox News, not simply the chairman of Fox Corp – Fox Information’s guardian firm.

Fisher defined the impact of the disclosure and the judge’s response. “So Dominion’s legal professionals have been arguing, seem to be, it matters what function Rupert Murdoch plays in Fox News, now not just Fox Corp., which is the mother or father company to Fox Information,” Fischer began, adding:

And what the judge was basically announcing was once, sure, if he’s an officer of Fox Information, that might potentially offer you license to discover more. And so probably the most issues that’s being delegated now or debated at this time is whether or not or now not Rupert Murdoch goes to be subpoenaed through Dominion in front of this jury to testify if he does. It could potentially be explosive.

“The malice bar is high, to prove malice, I mean, it’s a must to show, what they’ve already kind of overcome a part of the hurdle of doing this. However now they have to point out intent and malice,” delivered Poppy Harlow.

“It’s very excessive,” replied Fischer earlier than providing a word of warning if Fox had been to win the lawsuit:

And I’ll say there’s part of me as a journalist that’s just a little bit involved about this case, as a result of if Fox is to lose, primarily the precedent that is being set is that people who are highly effective, that need to sue news firms, that you would be able to, you realize the bar gets decreased a bit of bit for to an extent if Fox loses this case.

And so the article that I’m staring at is even let’s say if Dominion wins, do they win for $1.6 billion? In the event that they don’t, to me, it suggests that that bar shouldn’t be as low as it is usually in the event that they lost it all.

“What the choose did, saying that that should ease everybody’s concerns a bit of bit is that there is no fact. Fox can’t go into this pronouncing that there was once fact to what happened to Dominion, that we’ve he’s already taken off the desk. None of it was once proper,” replied Don Lemon.

“Let’s go back to that five weeks that I was talking about earlier than a trial like that. You’re going to have quite a few things that get litigated. One of the crucial choices that he made, to your point Don, final month was once that this argument that Fox was once making, which used to be that there’s information value in bringing these claims up on his air, can’t be litigated. It isn’t appropriate. It is false,” Fischer brought, recapping some prior rulings from Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis.

Watch the full clip above via CNN.

The put up CNN Media Analyst ‘Concerned’ Fox News Loss in Dominion Case Will Harm Journalism first appeared on Mediaite.